WE MAKE RESEARCHERS HAPPIER
PUBLISHING &
BOARDERS:
PEER REVIEW
DECENTRALIZED
SCIENCE WITHOUT
SCIZYX
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGES (APCS) FOR AUTHORS
0$
REVIEW TYPES
5
TARGET COUNTRIES
>50
INSTITUTION AND COMPANIES TOKEN SHARES
30%
AUTHOR AND REVIEWER TOKEN SHARES
30%
To build a global, decentralized ecosystem for scientific publishing where every researcher and reviewer receives transparent credit and fair token rewards for their contributions.
MISSION:
GOALS:
  • Eliminate the monopoly of large publishers and remove financial access barriers.
  • Accelerate research dissemination and improve peer-review quality.
  • Level the playing field for scientists worldwide, regardless of geography or funding.
MISSION & GOALS
UNFAIR REVENUE DISTRIBUTION
Publishers capture most profits, while authors and reviewers are not compensated for their work.

OUTDATES PROCESSES
Peer review still follows a centuries-old workflow: months-long delays, paper formats, and bureaucracy.
Five major Western publishers control over 50 % of all articles, dictating high prices and restricting access.
PUBLISHER MONOPOLY
KEY PROBLEMS IN TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING
Publications and reviews are stored immutably on chain—no single point of failure or middleman.
01. BLOCKCHAIN DECENTRALIZATION
Native SCZ tokens reward authors for published work and reviewers for quality feedback, while enabling DAO governance.
03. Token Incentives
Designed for rapid scaling across BRICS, MENA, Asia, and beyond—ensuring equal opportunity for all.
05. Global, Inclusive Ecosystem
A Reviewer Index combines h-index and on-platform reputation to objectively measure expert contributions.
04. New Quality Metrics
Authors choose between anonymous (closed) or transparent (open) review, with reviewer ratings visible.
02. Hybrid Peer
Review
OUR SOLUTION
Citations, downloads, and community ratings generate ongoing token rewards; token holders vote on platform upgrades via DAO.
Publication Engagement
After revisions, accepted papers gain journal status and appear in decentralized issue volumes.
Acceptance & Publication
Reviewers earn SCZ tokens for timely, high-quality reports; all review records are stored on chain.
Review Process
AI-driven matching by topic; authors may also nominate preferred and excluded reviewers.
Reviewer Assignment
Authors upload manuscripts; each receives a blockchain timestamp and DOI registration.
Preprint Submission
HOW IT WORKS
Serves as both utility (service payment, staking, access to AI tools) and governance (DAO voting) token.
Single SCZ Token
  • Slash penalties for bad-faith behavior
  • Anti-self-citation filters
  • Dynamic token issuance and a small on-chain transaction fee (e.g. 0.1 %) to fund operations.
Incentive Protections
  • Authors and Reviewers – 30 % of reward pool
  • Institutions (universities & corporates) – 30 %
  • Community engagement (comments, error reports) – 5 %
  • Team & DAO Reserve – 10 %
Reward Allocation
TOKENIMICS
Rewarding Insight
Empowering Research
SCIZYX
Made on
Tilda